Possibly redundant, given that the original announcement was only a couple of days ago, but: this week’s story for discussion is “The Best Monkey” by Daniel Abraham, first published in The Solaris Book of New SF 3, reprinted online here. I’ll make a post on Sunday evening to kick things off.
Author: Niall
Short Story Club
Reading club, that is. As mooted when we finished the Hugo short fiction discussions, I think I’m going to continue reading and inviting discussion about a story a week, at least for a while. The format remains the same: I’ll post a reminder on Friday, and a discussion post on Sunday that rounds up as much comment as I can find — which will probably be less than for the Hugo nominees, since I plan to focus on stories published for the first time in English this year.
Here’s my current list of things that have either caught my eye, or are by authors I already know I’m interested in, or have cropped up as recommendations somewhere (notably Rich Horton’s short fiction reviews in Locus), with discussion dates:
- “The Best Monkey” by Daniel Abraham [discussion]
- “A Tiny Feast” by Chris Adrian [discussion]
- “This Must Be The Place” by Elliott Bangs [discussion]
- “The Rising Waters” by Benjamin Crowell [discussion]
- “The Puma” by Theodora Goss [discussion]
- “The Slows” by Gail Hareven [discussion]
- “Oh He Is” by Karen Heuler [discussion]
- “Trembling Blue Stars” by Richard Kadrey [discussion]
- “A Tulip for Lucretius” by Ken MacLeod [discussion]
- “From the Lost Diary of TreeFrog7” by Nnedi Okorafor [Discussion]
- “Thieves of Silence” by Holly Phillips [discussion]
- “The Shangri-La Affair” by Lavie Tidhar [discussion]
- “A Weeping Czar Beholds the Fallen Moon” by Ken Scholes [discussion]
- “Unrest” by Grace Seybold [discussion]
- “Eros, Philia, Agape” by Rachel Swirsky [discussion]
- “The Radiant Car Thy Sparrows Drew” by Catherynne M Valente [discussion]
I think there’s a pretty good variety of styles and content in there, but of course the proof will be in the reading.
Year of the Floods
Interesting review-feature by Robin McKie in yesterday’s Observer:
Today, in these more strained ecological times, this kind of storytelling has taken on a harder edge and eco-thrillers have become a more robust genre – both on the page and on the screen. Upcoming films such as 2012 and The Book of Eli portray ecological and technological catastrophes like those depicted in The Day After Tomorrow (2004) and I Am Legend (2007). At the same time, plays such as Resilience and On the Beach have explored environmental issues with considerable success, while forthcoming novels from William Boyd, Margaret Atwood and Ian McEwan will also pursue ecological themes.
In short, environmental fiction is moving away from its roots in science fiction and is becoming part of mainstream literature – as is revealed by some of the most recent novels to tackle themes of climate change and the like.
I have both Cold Earth and The Rapture on my (unwieldy) TBR pile at the moment, and while McKie’s argument isn’t as rigorously argued as perhaps it might be, I do think he’s on to something. I’ve thought for a while that if I had a spare year or two, a project I would like to tackle is an analysis of the development of treatments of climate change — as distinct from disaster stories — in science fiction, both because I think it’s an interesting marker of how genre sf has engaged (or failed to engage) with the future in which we are actually living, and because I think it’s an interesting marker of the relationship between genre sf and mainstream-published sf, as McKie suggests. It seems to me there is are interestingly intertwined stories to be told there, and that the body of work that would need to be covered is not entirely unmanageable. [EDIT: I completely forgot that we’d discussed some of these issues before.]
Also, from the end of the article:
Solar by Ian McEwan. The idea for Solar (working title, due out in 2010) came to McEwan while stuck on a boat in the Arctic. His subject is climate change, considered through a central character who “steadily gets fatter through the novel” and the innate inability of human nature to counter it
Hmmm.
Strange Horizons Fund Drive
Well, I’m back. And, not entirely surprisingly, shattered. But I wanted to note that, while I was away, this year’s Strange Horizons fund drive started. Karen asked that, even if not donating, people consider posting about why Strange Horizons matters to them. I still hope to do that at some point later this month — for now, suffice to say that I’m proud to be part of the magazine, and specifically proud of my part of the magazine — but I have an immediate reason for reminding you all about the fund drive. Today, Friday, until midnight US Pacific time, John Scalzi is matching other peoples’ donations, up to a maximum of $500. So whatever you give could count double. If you like the magazine, therefore, this is the time to chip in! Click through to the fund drive page for ways to donate (and hey, you may also win a prize). And you can keep up to date with the fund drive progress and other news at the SH blog.
EDIT: As Susan reports (comment 111), good work everyone, and many thanks to Scalzi:
So up there in Scalzi’s post when he said “What I would say would be an even better outcome, however, is an even larger pile of donations sent along to Strange Horizons, for which my and Krissy’s $500 is just the cherry on the top.” You guys far exceeded any reasonable expectations for that “better outcome.” I’ve just finished doing all the tabulating, and the grand total for the 27-hour Scalzi Challenge period came to $9590. When you add in the matching funds from John and Krissy, that’s just over ten thousand dollars raised.
I don’t think I can possibly express how much this means to Strange Horizons, and to all of our staff members. We’re going to keep the fund drive open for a while longer in case anyone else wants to donate, but we’ve totally met and passed our overall fundraising goal. I’m totally overwhelmed by the generosity all of you have shown, and totally scared for what might happen if Scalzi ever decides to use his powers for evil.
After Worldcon

Worldcon was good, but exhausting. It’s been nice to have a couple of days to wind down in Montreal, rather than rushing home, though; the above is the wonderfully tranquil Japanese garden in the jardin botanique. Further thoughts on Worldcon (no doubt including some venomous and splenetic) will have to wait until we’re home. But here’s a bonus photo, especially for Graham: the tall people in sf club. As someone later pointed out, we rather missed a trick by not including Colin Harris …
In Montreal

… and today, the Worldcon begins.
As for those World Fantasy Award nominees: not bad, but the novel list looks very weird without Lavinia.
Back in Toronto

Outside the Royal Ontario Museum, which we visited today to see the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Bonus for Due South fans:

Yes, that is the very door where Fraser first sees Victoria.
On Lion’s Head

Which is in turn on the Bruce Peninsula.
In Toronto

“Baroque Obama”, according to the label. No, I don’t know, either.
On Holiday
Oh, I had such noble aims. I was going to use this holiday as an excuse to do a proper stock-taking post, looking back over what I’ve read so far this year and forward to what’s still to come. Instead, it’s got to the point where I’m out the door in an hour, and have various things to do before then. So all you get is some raw numbers: I’ve read 42 books this year; and these are, I think, the six best (in alphabetical order by author), that you all really should read.
- The Seven Beauties of Science Fiction by Istvan Csicsery-Ronay Jr
- Tokyo Cancelled by Rana Dasgupta
- Lavinia by Ursula K Le Guin
- Your Face Tomorrow 1: Fever and Spear by Javier Marias
- The Woman Who Thought She Was A Planet and Other Stories by Vandana Singh
- In Great Waters by Kit Whitfield
In fact, if you want me to know which one of these you should read, it’s the Whitfield; really, In Great Waters and Lavinia should both be on the BSFA Award Best Novel shortlist come 2010.
And with that, I’m off!