The problem with trying to review Anathem is that to give the details of exactly why it is so great would give away half the fun of reading it. I’ve never read a Neal Stephenson book I didn’t like, but there are definitely areas where he is weak – endings, for example, also resisting the urge to cram all of his copious research into a book wherever he can, and while I like the parts where he spends four pages describing, eg, the removal of Randy Waterhouse’s wisdom teeth, I can see it’s not going to work for everyone. The good news is that Anathem is a distinct improvement over his past works in that it has a plot, an ending, and tells a self-contained story in only 900 pages, which compared to the Baroque Cycle seems positively restrained.

The first three hundred pages or so are an intense piece of world-building and scene-setting. This is not Earth, but it’s something like it, and Stephenson dumps you straight into this world a few steps removed from our own, with just enough resemblance to our language for you to almost understand. I spent the first fifty pages flicking back and forth to the extensive glossary, but when it starts to fall into place it’s worth the effort.

The “religious” communities of this world are not based on belief in a higher power, but belief in logic, and the mathematical laws of the universe. (Holding what we would term religious belief is optional, and as much a matter for debate as any other part of the world.) The monks and nuns (“fraas” and “suurs”, as they are named in this world) live in their monasteries and convents (or “maths” and “concents”), discussing and debating for years, and stepping out into the secular world once every decade, hundred years, or thousand years to mingle with the people outside. It’s a very convincing, detailed world, all told in the first person, and when the outside world starts to encroach upon the sheltered, unchanging world of the concents you feel for the bewildered monks having to deal with the changes it brings. The middle part of the book is a little slower, although it does introduce Fraa Jad, probably my favourite character because of his habit of dropping bombshells into the conversation as though nothing has happened, while being completely aware that’s what he’s doing.

The dialogues between the monks take up large parts of the book, and here’s where the brilliance lies – they allow Stephenson to digress, tell stories, explore physics and the universe and philosophy, but rather than being interesting sections which don’t advance the plot, they are an absolutely integral part of it, and every time I felt my interesting in the abstract nature of the dialogues flagging they tied them right back into the plot.

If there was an area that disappointed, it was that in a book filled with many good characters, the main love interest is underdeveloped compared to almost everyone else, and the romance comes right out of nowhere and never really convinces. It’s a necessary part of the development of our protagonist from innocent, cloistered youth to the more worldly-wise figure he is at the end, and with the first person perspective it’s probably intentional that he doesn’t spot her attraction to him until it’s right in front of him, but even afterwards she doesn’t get developed as much as many of the other characters. While I appreciate the proper ending to the book, it’s almost too sudden a finish, and after nine hundred pages of buildup I could have stood to have a few more pages of epilogue.

Anathem is probably not going to win over anyone who didn’t like Snow Crash or Cryptonomicon, but it is a return to proper SF, and a return to form after the slight disappointment that was the Baroque Cycle. It’s funny, filled with characters you feel for and root for, and a hymn to the wonders of a world where logic is the key belief, without being blind to the problems and failures that would ensue. There’s no doubt that Stephenson thinks it would be a better world than ours.

21 thoughts on “Anathem

  1. My first thought was 900 pages!

    Is it a stand-alone? Or is there more to come? Strangely I only heard about this one last night and then I come across a review. The internet is amazing.

  2. Yes, I coming to think that Anathem is Stephenson to the power of Stephenson so I don’t think any fans are going to be disappointed.

    At the same time my current quick and dirty redux of the novel is “The Republic meets Harry Potter And The Half-Blood” so it is not without its problems.

  3. I read it 3 times in a week when I got the arc a while ago and I intend to reread it once it officially comes out and I think it’s a once in a decade sf novel.

    My current slogan for the novel would be “Book of the New Sun meets Emperor’s New Mind/Road to Reality” or “Gene Wolfe meets Roger Penrose” though the equations are at the end

  4. I read it 3 times in a week


    It took me a week to get through it once, and that was a week of fairly serious, head-down reading. Not sure I can get behind it as once-in-a-decade (except that it would probably take most people a decade to write it …), but I do think it’s one of the best of the year.

  5. I also boggle at three times in a week. How are your wrists?

    I would go further than once in a decade sf novel, I think it is actually unique, a true one-off (semi-jokey “x meets y” comparisons – of which I have more – notwithstanding.)

  6. I tend to read fast and consistently about 2-4 hours a day – I read about 170 novels this year – and the first read of Anathem took me a while, maybe 3 days since I kept going back and forth to the glossary/timeline, using pen and pencil to go through sketches of the concent to make sense of how the separation of tenners, centenarians and so on works, doing the “calcas”, thinking how the Teglon could work, what kind of pieces you need…

    The second and third time were just pure pleasure. I do occasional reviews for Robert at Fantasy Book Critic – Anathem to appear there soon, and this was one that took me a while to write and still got too lengthy that Robert had to cut it :)

    Regarding an earlier post, I have not read JK Rowling but I can see why “Plato meets JK Rowling” can be an adequate sound bite too

    Literary there are much better books out there in 08 – try 2666 by R. Bolano which is even longer and comes out this year here in the US and is a real masterpiece – that one I read the arc only 2 1/2 times in a week since I could not bear to go through the middle part murder/rape report after murder/rape report more than twice

    Anathem just tickled too much of my interests – I used to attend Roger Penrose lectures once though I moved away from academia after my PhD – all this stuff about Multiverse, Tegmark spaces, nature of consciousness and a lively narrative, plus the late over the top twist regarding one hooded character that made me roll my eyes with the I cannot believe that…

  7. 3 times in a week? I am impressed – it took me four days, and I thought that was pretty damn quick (and that included a four-hour train journey where I did nothing but read).

  8. I am a total Stephenson fan. I think The Baroque Cycle was excellent historical fiction (he even thanks Dorethea Dutton in the credits). I am working my way through Anathem _ I am not a swift reader. But I do like the story and characters so far. I always get a bit lost in Sptehenson’s scientific jargon and all his logic talk (it’s always there), but I appreciate as a plot style and on rereading grow to understand more.

  9. I agree with you about endings. Stephenson has had a problem with that since the Baroque Cycle. His earlier novels were tight and ended well. Anathem is self contained but it worked out a little to cleanly for my tastes. I also had some complaints about the characters which I note in my review. Regardless of these quibbles Stephenson is always worth the effort.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s